Symbolic Regression in Scientific Machine Learning: From Data Noise to Governing Equations



Introduction
In recent years, machine learning has become widely used in scientific contexts, producing strong predictive results. However, an increasingly clear limitation has emerged: many models perform well numerically but remain difficult to interpret.

At ActarusLab, our work focuses on this gap. We explore whether it is possible, starting from complex datasets, to recover simple and interpretable mathematical structures that describe the underlying system.

The problem with black-box models
Many modern machine learning approaches, particularly deep neural networks, are highly effective but difficult to analyze.

In practice, this means:

they provide accurate predictions
but offer limited insight into the underlying mechanisms
This becomes a critical issue in domains such as quantitative finance, physics, and computational chemistry, where interpretation is an essential part of validation.

Symbolic regression as an alternative approach
Unlike traditional machine learning methods, symbolic regression does not assume a fixed functional form.

Instead, it searches directly for a mathematical relationship of the form:

y = f(x₁, x₂, ..., xₙ)
The goal is not only to minimize prediction error, but to identify expressions that are:

interpretable
verifiable
stable across different conditions
High-fidelity simulation
In many cases, the process begins with the construction of high-fidelity simulations that approximate the behavior of the system under study.

These environments allow controlled data generation, which is essential for testing hypotheses in a reproducible way.

Extracting mathematical structure
The methodology can be summarized in three stages:

1. Data generation — Data is obtained from simulations or experimental sources.
2. Symbolic search — A search process explores candidate mathematical expressions that may describe the data.
3. Model selection — Only expressions that demonstrate stability and generalization ability are retained.
A here simple example
In some cases, the resulting model can take a form such as:

y = 0.83x² + here 1.2e−0.4t
What makes this interesting is not its complexity, but the fact that it is:

directly interpretable
testable on new data
usable without an underlying black-box model
Applications
Quantitative finance
To identify non-stationary relationships in time series and detect regime changes.

Drug discovery
To reduce overfitting in QSAR models and improve robustness in predictive pipelines.

Complex systems
To uncover emergent structure in high-dimensional datasets.

Interpretability as a scientific constraint
A model that cannot be explained is difficult to validate rigorously.

For this reason, in our approach interpretability is not an optional feature but a constraint.

We prioritize models that are simpler and verifiable, even at the cost of some predictive performance.

Conclusion
The objective is not to replace scientific reasoning with more complex algorithms, but to use algorithms to recover simpler and more understandable representations of complex systems.

In this sense, symbolic regression provides a bridge between data complexity and mathematical structure.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *